WRX STI vs Evo VIII: Rally Legend Rivalry
Subaru STI vs Mitsubishi Evo comparison. The eternal debate between these AWD turbo rivals.
The Eternal Rivals
No rivalry in automotive history runs deeper than Subaru WRX STI versus Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Born from World Rally Championship competition, these turbocharged all-wheel-drive sedans defined a generation of performance cars. The Evo VIII and corresponding WRX STI represent both marques at their competitive peak.
This comparison examines two cars that are more alike than different—yet each inspires fierce loyalty from its devotees.
Detailed Comparison
The Showdown
Engine and Power
Subaru WRX STI (GD/GG):
The EJ257 2.5L turbocharged flat-four produces 300hp with its characteristic boxer rumble. The larger displacement provides more low-end torque than the Evo, while the unequal-length headers create the distinctive "Subaru sound."
Mitsubishi Evo VIII:
The 4G63 2.0L turbocharged inline-four delivers 271hp (JDM: 280hp). What it lacks in displacement, it makes up in revability and proven tuning potential. The 4G63 is legendary in the tuning world, with countless builds exceeding 600hp.
Verdict: STI for everyday drivability; Evo for tuning potential and top-end performance.
Drivetrain
STI: Symmetrical AWD with Driver-Controlled Center Differential (DCCD). The system allows manual bias adjustment between front and rear, letting drivers tune behavior for conditions. Mechanical and engaging.
Evo VIII: Active Center Differential (ACD) with optional Active Yaw Control (AYC). The electronically-controlled rear differential actively vectors torque between rear wheels. More technologically sophisticated.
Verdict: Evo for technology and precision; STI for mechanical engagement.
Handling
STI: The Subaru feels more nose-heavy, with a tendency toward understeer in stock form. The symmetrical layout provides predictable balance. Many owners appreciate the more accessible handling limits.
Evo VIII: Sharper turn-in, more neutral handling, and the AYC system actively helps rotate the car. The Evo feels more pointy and immediate—less forgiving but more rewarding when driven at the limit.
Verdict: Evo for experienced drivers; STI for those learning or preferring a safety margin.
Reliability and Costs
STI: EJ257 is known for ringland failure under aggressive tuning without proper supporting modifications. However, with careful tuning and maintenance, they're reliable. Larger dealer network means better service availability.
Evo VIII: 4G63 is incredibly robust when maintained. Transfer case and AYC systems require specialized service. Fewer dealers complicates service, especially in North America.
Vehicle A
Pros
- ✓ Boxer engine sound
- ✓ Larger displacement torque
- ✓ Better dealer network
- ✓ More forgiving handling
Cons
- ✗ Ringland failure risk
- ✗ Heavier than Evo
- ✗ Less responsive turn-in
- ✗ Higher fuel consumption
Vehicle B
Pros
- ✓ Superior tuning platform
- ✓ Active Yaw Control
- ✓ Sharper handling
- ✓ Lighter weight
Cons
- ✗ Specialized service needed
- ✗ Smaller dealer network
- ✗ Transfer case maintenance
- ✗ Parts availability
The Verdict
The Verdict
Choose the WRX STI if you:
- Value the boxer engine character
- Want easier dealer service access
- Prefer more forgiving handling limits
- Appreciate the rally heritage and sound
Choose the Evo VIII if you:
- Prioritize sharp, precise handling
- Want superior tuning potential
- Can handle specialized maintenance requirements
- Value technological sophistication
The honest truth: Both cars deliver on the rally-bred all-wheel-drive sedan promise. The differences are real but subtle—you'd be happy with either.
For first-time owners, the STI's broader support network and more forgiving character make it easier to live with. For experienced enthusiasts who understand the Evo's needs, the Mitsubishi offers a marginally sharper driving experience.
The rivalry exists because both cars are excellent. Choose based on availability, condition, and which philosophy speaks to you.